Does Neutrogena Makeup Remover Allergic Reactions

Neutrogena customers take filed a class action lawsuit against the beauty company, maxim that a range of Neutrogena cleansing towelette products can cause burns.

Los Angeles resident Jaimie Potts was attracted to Neutrogena products for their reputation as being safe and healthy for skin while being constructive. Based on this understanding, she recounts that she purchased multiple Neutrogena cleansing towelette products for her girl.

Allegedly, her daughter developed a rash, peeling pare and a burning sensation from using the towelettes, even though she used them correctly.

According to Potts, Neutrogena had misrepresented these products as safe. Particularly, Potts hones in on the assertion that the visitor omitted primal data that the products tin can be harmful. She also notes that the company went and then far every bit to deny assertions that the production can cause skin issues.

The Neutrogena facial cleansing wipes grade action lawsuit states Potts was financially injured past Neutrogena.

Allegedly, she relied on the company's representations when making her purchases. She stresses that had she known that the products could harm skin, she would not have purchased them.

Co-ordinate to Potts, many other customers were similarly injured considering they relied on Neutrogena's representations of its products.

The Neutrogena cleansing towelette class activeness lawsuit then digs into the company's diverse statements that Potts believes are misleading.

She notes that the products are deemed "gentle enough to use effectually sensitive eye area, even for contact lens wearers."

Allegedly, the use instructions for the product informs users that "there is no need to rinse" with water later on using the products. Potts says this leads customers to believe the products are "as beneficial equally water."

Additionally, the visitor advertises that the products are "opthamologist tested," "dermatologist tested" and "allergy tested," which, co-ordinate to Potts, gives users the impression the products are canonical by these professionals and discovered to be hypoallergenic.

Beyond the statements made directly on the production's characterization and advertisements, consumers rely on the the reputation of Neutrogena to understand the products every bit safe. Potts notes that Neutrogena is known every bit the "#ane Dermatologist recommended skincare brand."

The Neutrogena towelette class action lawsuit states that the company not only implies the products are safe, merely states this explicitly, maxim the products "won't irritate peel."

According to Potts, Neutrogena echoes this statement in a number of ways through the product advertisement.

However, client complaints bespeak the products do not live upwardly to these advertisements and implications, the class action lawsuit says.

Numerous customers have supposedly come up forward to state that they were injured by their use of the towelettes. Potts explains that consumers' complaints well-nigh these products date back at least three years, and recount instances of chemical burns, rashes, skin irritation, skin peeling, facial disfigurement and other issues.

Potts argues Neutrogena could have and should have taken action in light of these responses, but has not changed class since producing the products.

She states that the company has non added warnings for the possible agin furnishings of the product, nor has the visitor included warnings about the risks associated with repeated use of the products, even though many consumers written report that they used the products repeatedly before having bug with them.

The Neutrogena towelette class action lawsuit asserts that the company had, at minimum, a duty to inform consumers of the known risks associated with the products. Federal regulations supposedly require companies to provide such warning labels and statements to consumers.

To add insult to injury, Potts notes Neutrogena pays lip service to the thought of transparency, proverb: "Nosotros want you to feel good about how nosotros make Neutrogena products. Y'all can only practise that if you have the facts."

Instead, the company chose to omit essential facts, putting profits ahead of its consumers' health and financial interest.

Potts argues that the visitor was unjustly enriched past the sale of the products.She seeks amercement on behalf of herself and a Grade of similarly afflicted consumers.

In an update to this legal news, the Neutrogena face wipe injury class activity lawsuit has been removed to federal court since information technology was initially filed.

Have you purchased a skincare product that caused you lot to have an adverse reaction? Share your experiences in the comments below.

Potts is represented by John J. Nelson of Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP.

The Neutrogena Facial Cleanser Class Activity Lawsuit is Jaimie Potts v. Neutrogena Corporation, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-06323, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Please note: Top Grade Actions is not a settlement administrator or constabulary business firm. Elevation Form Deportment is a legal news source that reports on form activity lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Deportment does not procedure claims and we cannot advise you on the condition of any class action settlement merits. You lot must contact the settlement administrator or your chaser for any updates regarding your merits condition, merits form or questions about when payments are expected to exist mailed out.

Source: https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/consumer-products/beauty-products/neutrogena-class-action-lawsuit-says-cleansing-towelettes-cause-burns/

Posted by: curtisyouper.blogspot.com

Share this post